|
Goalies
Jul 16, 2009 13:33:08 GMT -5
Post by Zoom Waffles on Jul 16, 2009 13:33:08 GMT -5
For the upcoming season, would you rather have the St. Louis tandem (Mason/Conklin) or the Colorado (Anderson/Budaj) tandem?
My only concern with St. Louis is that one of them could lose their job to another goalie in the system (Bishop, Toivonen). In Colorado, there's really no one besides those two. That said, Mason/Conklin are definitely more proven than Anderson/Budaj, and St. Louis is sure to put a better team in front of them than Colorado.
Salaries can also be taken into consideration... Mason/Conklin combine for $4.3 million, while Anderson/Budaj make $2.75 million combined.
Will the difference in stats be worth the difference in salary?
|
|
|
Goalies
Jul 16, 2009 13:40:21 GMT -5
Post by fukufuji on Jul 16, 2009 13:40:21 GMT -5
Anderson Budai for me. St Louis has been crazy. The way they waived manny was really weird who knows what they'll do in net.
If colorodo stays healthy could be a turn around season but st. louis should do way better in next year or 2.
I don't think I would bother with conklin. He has had moments of brilliance but can never outright win the job. I don't see any of those goalies unseating Mason. I might reccomend just mason which would leave you another valuable roster spot.
I think anderson budjai would go good with your rebuild.
|
|
|
Goalies
Jul 16, 2009 13:46:41 GMT -5
Post by Zoom Waffles on Jul 16, 2009 13:46:41 GMT -5
i've got bryzgalov, mason, and osgood right now. but i also have the 15th/16th picks in the old-man-draft. I'm thinking I'll trade mason/osgood for decent depth and/or young guys, and use those back-to-back picks to snag anderson/budaj.
bryzgalov/anderson/budaj should get me through until koskinen/markstrom/gustavsson are ready to go. My All-Scandanavia goalie prospects are going to be great.
|
|