|
Post by Zoom Waffles on Jul 23, 2009 12:54:36 GMT -5
12-team H2H Keeper League Start 2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G nightly 26-man Rosters Skater Cats: G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPG, PPA, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG, FW Goalie Cats: W, GA, GAA, Svs, Sv%, SHO
Keep 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 2G plus 5 anywhere.
Roster:
C: Thornton, Briere, Cogliano, Backlund, Fillpula, Stajan LW: Hartnell, Sharp, Ponikarovsky, Neal, MacArthur RW: Doan, Lupul, Tikhonov, Stempniak D: Campbell, Wideman, Campoli, Kubina, Martin, Kuba, Zidlicky, Quincey G: Quick, Vokoun, Leclaire, McKenna
I'm thinking... C: Thornton, Briere, Cogliano LW: Hartnell, Sharp, Neal RW: Doan, Lupul, Tikhonov D: Campbell, Wideman, Zidlicky, Kubina G: Quick, Vokoun 5 Anywhere: Fillpula, Backlund, Campoli, Quincey, Leclaire
Picks (overall): 2nd, 10th, 14th, 16th, 22nd, 35th, 37th, 47th
Would you keep anyone different? Where do I most need improvement? Who could I trade to make those improvements?
|
|
|
Post by bu11durm on Jul 24, 2009 10:33:05 GMT -5
My first impression is that in H2H w/nightly lineups, I'd rather keep a 12th forward than a 6th D. Maybe Ponikarovsky or MacArthur over Campoli. Now does the math support my first impression? I'd estimate you'd get to use the 4th LW about 50% of the time and the 6th D about 80%. You expect more points out of the forward but would use him less. So i think it would probably come down to expected power play time (since your league uses all 3 PP categories). Also, the deciding factor could come down to who's available in the draft.
|
|
|
Post by fukufuji on Jul 24, 2009 13:18:46 GMT -5
I like your keepers. I think improvement in net and on D (story of our lives? LOL)
A nice franchise goalie that will be getting 30 wins after a few seasons would be nice.
One more corner stone star D too.
|
|
|
Post by Zoom Waffles on Jul 24, 2009 14:41:33 GMT -5
really? I thought D was my strong suit... wideman had 50 last year. I don't think I have the assets to make a trade for anything better at D... if anything, I'll have to trade a dman to get a better G.
|
|
|
Post by fukufuji on Jul 24, 2009 15:28:28 GMT -5
Sorry I guess I'm not taking enough into account. It is very nice D for a ultra deep league my bad.
|
|
|
Post by bu11durm on Jul 24, 2009 23:25:28 GMT -5
as for D, I'd say the impression is another stud would be nice. Another good year out of Wideman might put him in that category but the name just doesn't jump out yet. There definitely is some depth and potential there. Just the high-end names don't jump out for a 12-team league.
as for G, I agree, this is the one area you could make the biggest leap. If you've got the confidence in the Campoli-types, then maybe you include a D in a move for a goaltender.
|
|
|
Post by fukufuji on Jul 26, 2009 21:04:12 GMT -5
Kinda what I was meaning. No knock on your D, its a nice deep set of skill. If wideman pulls another season like that then maybe we can consider him a cornerstone all star D and there is no reason he can't. I'm just a little worried that he's a top pairing in Boston only becasue there is no one else really there to knock him down. He has the tools though one to watch for sure.
Maybe be better to focus on net or a high scoring winger and see how your D works out before tinkering.
|
|