|
Post by kingsfan24 on Jul 19, 2009 3:44:55 GMT -5
I'd have to go with deal #2. I think of this way with #2 you get a young established top 6 winger on an upbeat and good offensive team, a top pairing defense on of the hottest young teams out and a prospect with top pairing defense potential. #1 you get a top line winger with ppg potential, a top 4 defenseman and a borderline prospect who could opt to stay in Europe for the rest of his career while you lose a top 6 forward on top of to get those assets. #3 well I don't like the man regardless but he was offering soooo much more questionable players in the mix it scares me. It breaks down like this for me a top 6 forward, potential top 4 defenseman, potential starting goalie on a terrible defensive team and a potential top 6 forward. Again, he's got too many questionable players honestly if you consider his deal I'd like to see you grab more "established" players because you are giving up a potential stud.
|
|